I'm sitting here, looking at all the bank cards and means of identification in my wallet and I cannot help but feel so uneasy. The number of codes and passwords one accumulates throughout their life is utterly sickening. We're forced to protect our allowances from any unauthorised access. Yet theft continues to emerge, now to a level where our simple passcodes won't cut it. What does privacy mean anymore? Can we really trust the sources that hold our information? When are we ever going to feel socially secure without having to identify ourselves with a social security number? Why are we so swept into being part of a system with seemingly no choice?
Everyone is given their numbers and their cards. I really wonder if people can feel proud of holding these things, as if now they are suddenly part of the world when given these means of participating in the system. Instead of putting up the protective gates of our assets, why don't we first ask why theft occurs in the first place. Ah, but the excuse will be that it can never be dealt with; it is part of human nature; theft and greed and power are timeless sins never to be erased. Can't we see that those who are in the position to make the decisions against theft and unjust claims to power are actually those who are stealing and abusing leadership? Every human being has seen a war. Every government has abused their people. Retaliation of the people is what theft on a personal level is. If one cannot reach the positions of power, one attacks what is directly surrounding them. Just as in personal moments of stress, we lash out on those right in front of us instead of dealing directly with the source of stress. Because to get to that source and to overcome that stress is a challenge requiring a lot of perceptional shifts, logical reason, and other such cognitive skills. Denial is safer, right? If people can be in denial, so can governments and systems. And their denial seeps onto their followers in such an authoritative manner that it stifles the natural, human questioning process.
The distribution of money is so blatantly disfigured. Consequently, the distribution of power is blatantly disfigured since we are made to believe that money is power. These timeless sins are being made timeless by those who are contributing to this global imbalance in their seats of "power". History is cyclical for a reason. It's a song playing on repeat. When are we ever going to change the track? It's getting old and I'm tired of studying the same mishaps occurring in different forms. What will be the force that produces real change? It seems as though it will have to be something that is beyond our control, to make us see that we are but a small pebble in the oceans of this universe. Do we really want some sort of cosmic obliteration of this Earth to be the only way to change and to force us into a universal perspective? Creating systems based solely on the reliance of the finite and temporal will logically lead to a finite and transient system that can only go so far.
But it's quite hard to convince anyone of this if they are not first willing to assert that we are infinite beings. THAT is the true downfall of humanity- the focus on materialism. If we truly realised our immaterial natures and our infinite existences, there would be no greed or power. Our minds would naturally shift to issues of purposive importance and fuse into a collective to support one another as these Earthly challenges play out. We are made of this Earth and composed of the particles of stars. It is in our nature! We are going against every element we are composed of and denying it to the point we are abusing the Earth. Anything that is not composed of these natural elements and has no life force is not of any importance. Anything that does not enliven the soul should be obliterated. Try telling this to a government official. The governmental systems are soul-less. That is why they fail.
I need no bank card to display the wealth of my true being. I need no password to protect my soul from anything of this world. We are self-sufficient beings that can easily cooperate with this Earth and live off of its resources alone. I'm starting to think we were far more intelligent in our "primitive" stages. But if history is cyclical, we might just have to end up there again.
No comments:
Post a Comment